Thanks to Ellen Roberts for this sign!
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
the New Obama
Received from a friend: Art Woodstone
A
note on our contributor:
Art
Woodstone started his career 63 years ago writing sports for the first
Newhouse paper, the Staten Island Advance and who progressed through Variety,
the Sunday NY Daily News, the Herald-Tribune to BBC and, so help me, Helen Gurley
Brown's Cosmopolitan with several other media outlets along the way.
|
May the Force protect us from
my incisive brethren in the media.
Read this typical lead paragraph reporting the President's new get-tough attitude:
'President Barack Obama bluntly [italics added] challenged Congress
Monday to act immediately on his new jobs plan, brandishing a copy of the
legislation in the Rose Garden and demanding: "No games, no politics, no
delays."'
What's wrong with that paragraph? What's wrong with his speech last Thursday and his statements since? What's wrong with Obama? What's wrong is that this very bright, overly self-controlled man still cannot bring himself to openly identify his real foe. It's not Congress, it's the Republicans in Congress. Does Obama think that by treating the Democrats the same "tough" way he treats the Republicans in Congress, he will ingratiate himself with the right, softening them up so he can pass his jobs bill--or any other important legislation? If so, he has a short memory. He hasn't grasped what a blunt President needs to do to grind down an intractable, belligerent foe. If he cannot grind them down, he can at least impress on voters that GOP intransigence and hostility are undermining progress toward solving the nation's awesome problems. The time for diplomacy passed, almost from the day Obama took office. That's key to understanding a man who has missed countless opportunities to speak bluntly. What is equally troubling to me personally is that so many reporters chose a word like blunt to portray the new Obama when bluntness means narrowing in on the source of a problem and naming it. Instead, eager to find a new Obama [new make news], the press corps deliberately redefined vagueness as bluntness. In his speech, Obama was neither blunt nor candid. His tone was harder; his repeated message of "now" theatrical. But style should never be mistaken for bluntness. Where the is the new Obama? Despite help from a disingenuous press, I fear that when it comes time [if ever] to vote on a jobs bill, the President will settle for scraps. His probable collapse should not be taken as recognition of reality. I console myself with the thought that if it isn't Obama in 2012, it will be something worse. |
Monday, September 12, 2011
Bill Mahr on Palin's future
http://front.mhttp://front.moveon.org/bill-maher-on-palins-future-what-am-i-the-idiot-whisperer/?rc=fb.fan
Bill Mahr says it straight!
Bill Mahr says it straight!
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Compassionate conservatives?
http://front.moveon.org/jon-stewart-f_ck-the-poor/?fc=fb.rp.2&rc=fb.fanJon Stewart says ithttp://front.moveon.org/jon-stewart-f_ck-the-poor/?fc=fb.rp.2&rc=fb.fan
Fox at its Foxyiest.
Fox at its Foxyiest.
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
Koch Bros. planned takeover of USA
...The
second Civil War, Charles Koch, half of the far right-wing Koch Brothers,
doesn't have any doubts at all. He spoke at the last closed bi-annual
fundraiser he and his brother hold for a secret list of like-thinking million-
and billionaires, and guests like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and the brothers'
favorite justice, Clarence Thomas. But the word leaked out. -Art Woodstone During his welcoming remarks, Charles Koch warned his guests that the 2012 elections are nothing short of a battle "for the life or death of this country." He then acknowledged the individuals and families who had given more than $1 million to the brothers' efforts—though he misspoke, saying "more than a billion," earning a huge laugh from the crowd. "Well, I was thinking of Obama and his billion-dollar campaign," Koch said, to more laughter and cheers. "So I thought, 'We gotta do better than that.'" (Forbes pegs the brothers' personal net worth at around $22 billion apiece.) (The complete audio and transcript of his remarks are available at The BRAD BLOG |
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)