You may have noticed that the four Supreme Court decisions since 2000 that most directly
affect elections in the United States have been carried by the five Republican
appointees. In each case, the impact adversely affects Democrats.
Scalia, Roberts, Thomas, Kennedy and Alito in 2010
in Citizens United and again today in overturning a hundred-year-old law
restricting campaign spending in Montana; Scalia, Thomas, Rehnquist, O'Connor
and Kennedy in 2000 re Bush v. Gore.
Here's the fourth
decision which has been generally overlooked and which was designed to weaken
the influence of African Americans who overwhelmingly vote for the
Democrat:
"Race Permitted in
Redistricting (April 18, 2001): In crucial 5–4 ruling, justices reverse
lower court finding that North Carolina legislature had violated the
Constitution by using race as a predominant factor in drawing boundaries of
congressional district. Because state's black voters vote overwhelmingly
Democratic, Court could not determine definitively that redistricting was based
on unconstitutional racial considerations rather than permissible political
considerations."
Yeh, sure.
This Thursday's decision on the Affordable Care Act
on the face of it may not seem like an election matter. But if, as is expected,
the five on the right vote to overturn or gut it of its principal clause, it
will have been as partisan a decision as the others.
Does anyone doubt
that the Republican fever to destroy Obamacare isn't a major campaign issue; its
loss can and will be characterized during the campaign this year as another blow
against Obama's "drift toward socialism" and yet another major mistake by those
dangerous Democrats.
Art
W.
Art: thanks so much for keeping us on the straight and narrow. - jm
No comments:
Post a Comment